It’s not entirely clear how we are to
understand fate as it is figured in
the Homeric mythos, particular regarding the relationship between fate and the
gods. There are several alternatives to consider: perhaps “fate” is
simply shorthand for the will of Zeus and the other Olympians. Alternatively,
fate might be a personified deity in its own right, or some primordial force
that possesses equal sovereignty over the actions of both mortals and
immortals. The Iliad seems to suggest
different answers at different times, but Zeus’ conversation with Hera concerning
the fate of Sarpedon gives us something relatively concrete and specific to serve
as an interpretive foundation.
Zeus says “Fate has it that Sarpedon… / …
is to be killed by Patroclus. / Shall I take him out of battle while he still
lives… /…Or shall I let him die under Patroclus’ hands?” (16.471-5). The fact
that he can even ask such a question tells us two things. One, fate is something
external to the will of the gods. Two, the gods have (or at least believe they
have) the power to counteract fate. This capacity of the gods to supersede fate
is reaffirmed in Hera’s answer: “Do it.
But don’t expect all of us to approve” (16.480-81). Note that she doesn’t argue
against Zeus’ proposal on the grounds that what he suggests is impossible, but
rather that doing so would open the door for the other gods to follow his lead
in disrupting the proper course of fate. Thus, this passage establishes for us that in Homer’s world fate is a force that lies outside the will of the gods
but is nonetheless respected by them – not out of necessity, but out of convention.
No comments:
Post a Comment