As this is my first blog post, I have to mention my lack of
experience with the studies of classical works. I have taken Latin for four
years in high school but was only exposed to classical literature through
excerpts or something of that nature. The first work we are introduced to in Homeric Iliad is the epic Gilgamesh. I believe in class we touched
on the paradox of the characterization of Gilgamesh. I want to expand on this
as well as other topics a bit further because it is interesting to note how
Enkidu is referred to Gilgamesh’s companion prior to his meeting with
Gilgamesh. I think this is meant to be interpreted as a kind of foreshadowing
of the two characters. From this we get an imagery of the two characters as
being in love, or, at least, the fellowship or union of the two. This is
evident in the morning after Enkidu’s death, when Gilgamesh mourns for his
loss. Gilgamesh seems to have transformed throughout the epic. He transforms
into a kind of Enkidu, as if he takes on some of Enkidu’s personality. His
union with Enkidu brings about a more sincere and forgiving character. Perhaps
this is a good transition for delving into the story in the Iliad since there might be references we
can draw from the transformation of Gilgamesh to the transformation of
characters in the Iliad. One trait of epic poetry, which I find to be
interesting, is the repetition of the introduction of characters. Each
character is given a descriptive epithet with each introduction. So, I feel
there are going to be similar characteristics in the Iliad.
No comments:
Post a Comment